Are instructional design models universally presented in the same order and number of steps?

Instructional design models are not universally presented in the same order and do not adhere to a consistent number of steps. Different models, such as ADDIE, Dick and Carey, or Kemp, have distinct structures and processes that reflect varying educational philosophies and approaches to instructional design. Each model is tailored to specific instructional needs and contexts, leading to differences in how steps are organized and implemented.

For example, in the ADDIE model, the steps are often listed as Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation, while other models may prioritize different phases or combine certain steps. Additionally, the flexibility of instructional design allows practitioners to adapt models to suit particular learning environments or objectives, further contributing to variations in order and structure. This adaptability is essential to effectively address the diverse needs of learners and the specific goals of educational programs.